|
Biola Home Page My Math Papers Woopy Home Page |
|
Theorem 1. Defn. (2) implies defn. (1).
Proof. Let F, F' be the given foci, at distance
2 c apart, and let FP + PF' = 2 a, where a > c. Chose
coordinate axes so that F is (-c, 0) and F' is (0, c).
Let A be (-a, 0) and B be (a, 0), then FA + F'A = 2 a, and FB + F'B
= 2 a, so that A and B lie on the ellipse. Let e = c/a, and let
A' be the point (-a/e, 0), B' be the point(a/e, 0). Let P be any
point (x, y) on the ellipse, and let Q be its projection on the x-axis.
Let L, L' be the lines ^ x-axis through A', B'. Let the line L" through
P parallel to x-axis cut L, L' at N, N'. We shall prove FP / NP = e.
Notice FP + F'P = 2 a = AQ + BQ = e (A'Q + B'Q) . . . . (a)
Also FP2 - F'P2 = FQ2 - F'Q2, so that
FP - FP' = (FQ - F'Q) × (FQ + F'Q) / (FP + F'P)
= (A'Q - B'Q) × 2 c/2 a = e (A'Q - B'Q) . . . . (b)
Solving (a) and (b) then gives FP = e NP and F'P = e N'P. Thus F and L
serve as focus and directrix defining the ellipse by FP = e NP for all
point P, and so do F' and L' also.
Theorem 2. Defn. (1) implies defn. (2).
Proof. Choose coordinates so that the focus is F(p,0),
and the directrix is the y-axis. Eccentricity is e.
Lemma. Any line L: y = y0, will intersect the
ellipse K at two points at most, whose midpoint lie on a fixed line parallel
to the y-axis.
Proof: Suppose a point P(x, y0) is on L Ç K,
then let N be the point (0, y0). Then FP2 = e2 NP2 gives
(x - p)2 + y02 = e2 x2, or
(1 - e2) x2 - 2 p x + (p2 + y02) = 0 . . . . (i)
This equation has at most 2 roots for x, and the average of the roots
is p/(1 - e2), which is a constant independent of y0. Thus the midpoints
of the two intersection points of L and K lie on the line
L': x = p', where p' = p/(1 - e2).
This means the ellipse is symmetric about L' as well as about the x-axis.
Lemma is proved.
Observe if y0 is too big, then (i) has no roots, because the
discriminant in a quadratic formula is
p2 - (1 - e2) (p2 + y02), = e2 p2 - (1 - e2)y02.
Then the maximum value of y0 is e p/Ö(1 - e2) in order for L
Ç K to be non-empty.
Let F' be the mirror image of F across L', and L" the
line x = 2 p', so that L" is also the mirror image of y-axis across L'.
If L intersects K at two points P(x1, y0) and P'(x2, y0) where
x1 and x2 are roots of (i), and L intersects y-axis at N and L Ç L"
= N', then due to symmetry across L', F'P = FP' = e NP' = e N'P.
\FP + F'P = e NP + e N'P = 2 e p', which is a constant. This proves
that P lies on the curve defined by Defn. 2. QED
Note: As a special case, if y0 = 0, then the
solutions to (i) are
p/(1 + e) and p/(1 - e).
These points A(p/(1 + e), 0) and A'(p/(1 - e), 0) are mirror images
of each other across L'.
Theorem 3. Defn. 1 implies Defn. 3.
Proof. Using the same diagram as Thm. 2, Let P be
(x, y), then
(x - p)2 + y2 = FP2 = e2 NP2 = e2 x2, i.e.,
(1 - e2) x2 - 2 p x + (p2 + y2) = 0 . . . . (i), i.e.,
(1-e2) [x - p/(1-e2)]2 + y2 = p2 e2 /(1-e2), i.e.,
[(1-e2)/p e]2 [x - p/(1-e2)]2
+ [Ö(1-e2)/p e]2 y2 = 1,
which is of the form in defn. 3, where the center of the ellipse
is (p/(1-e2), 0)
and the major and minor radii are
a = p e / (1-e2) and b = p e / Ö(1-e2).
Theorem 4. Defn. 2 implies Defn. 3.
Proof. [I avoid squareroot sign!]
Let P(x,y) be such that
FP + F'P = 2 a . . . . (i)
where F(-c,0), F'(c,0) are the
foci. Let e = c/a. Let Q be the projection of P on x-axis.
Then from Pythagoras' theorem FQ2 - F'Q2 = FP2 - F'P2 .
\ 2 c . 2 x = (FQ + F'Q) (FQ - F'Q) = (FP + F'P) (FP - F'P)
= 2 a (FP - F'P).
\ FP - F'P = 2 c x / a = 2 e x . . . . (ii).
Adding (i) and (ii) gives FP = a + e x.
FP2 = FQ2 + PQ2 then gives (a + e x)2 = (c + x)2 + y2, i.e.,
(1-e2) x2 + y2 = a2 (1 - e2), i.e.,
x2/a2 + y2/b2 = 1 where b2 = a2 (1 - e2) = a2 - c2.
Theorem 5. Defn. 3 implies defn. 1.
Proof. Let P(x,y) satisfy x2/a2 + y2/b2 = 1,
where a > b. Let c = Ö(a2 - b2). Let F be (-c, 0), and the line L
be x = a /e where e = c/a.
Then FP2 = (c + x)2 + y2 = (c + x)2 + b2 (1 - x2/a2)
= (c2 + b2) + 2 c x + x2 (1 - b2/a2)
= a2 + 2 c x + (c x / a)2 = (a + c x / a)2 = (a + e x)2
= e2 (a/e + x)2 = e2 PN2 where N is the projection of P on L.
\ FP = e PN.
Theorem 6. Defn. 3 implies defn. 2.
Proof. Let P(x,y) satisfy x2/a2 + y2/b2 = 1,
where a > b. Let c = Ö(a2 - b2). Let F be (-c, 0) and F' be
(c, 0). Let e = c/a. We need to prove PF + PF' is constant.
By Pythagoras' thm., PF2 = y2 + (c + x)2. But
y2 = b2 (1 - x2/a2), so that
PF2 = b2 - x2 b2/a2 + c2 + 2 c x + x2
= x2 c2 / a2 + 2 c x + a2 = x2 e2 + 2 e a x + a2
= (a + e x)2.
\ PF = a + e x.
Similarly, PF'2 = y2 + (c - x)2 = . . . = (a - e x)2,
so that PF' = a - e x.
\ PF + PF' = 2 a, a constant.
Theorem 7. Let F, F' be the foci of an ellipse K,
then for each point P on K, the tangent at P makes equal angles with PF
and with PF'.
Proof.
Method 1. Assume K is x2/a2 + y2/b2 = 1 . . . . (i)
and F(-c,0), F'(c, 0) are the foci, where c2 = a2 - b2. Let
P be (x, y) and let x = a cos t for some 0 £ t < 2 p, then we pick
y = b sin t so that (i) is satisfied. As t moves from 0 to 2 p, P moves
one anticlockwise revolution along K. [t is called a parameter for K, so
that each value of t represents exactly one point on K].
Let L be the tangent line at P(a cos t, b sin t), then
its slope = dy/dx = (dy/dt) / (dx/dt) = b cos t / -a sin t. Hence
the slope of the normal L' at P (the line perpendicular
to the tangent line at P)
= -1 / above = (a/b) tan t. Hence by the "one point
+ slope" form of eqn. of str. line, the eqn. of L' is
y - b sin t = (a/b) tan t (x - a cos t). Let it cut
the x-axis at Q where y = 0,
\ - b sin t = (a/b) tan t (x - a cos t),
\ x = a cos t - (b2/a) cos t = e c cos t where e = c/a.
\ area DPFQ / area DPF'Q = QF / QF' = (
c + e c cos t) / (c - e c cos t)
= (a + e a cos t)/(a - e a cos t) = (a + e x)/(a - e x) = PF / PF'.
\ Q is equidistant from lines PF and PF'. \ PQ bisects ÐFPF'.
Since PQ ^ L, \ L makes equal angles with PF and PF'.
Method 2 (no calculus, no coordinate geometry !!!) Let the tangent line at P be TPT', where ÐFPT and ÐF'PT' both < p/2. Suppose ÐFPT ¹ ÐF'PT'. Let F" be the mirror image of F' across the line TPT'. Then FPF" is not a str. line, hence the line FF" crosses TPT' at some point P" different from P. P" is outside the ellipse because TPT' is a tangent. But then P"F + P"F' = P"F + P"F" = FF" < FP + PF" = FP + PF', which is possible only if P" is inside the ellipse. This is absurd. Therefore ÐFPT can only = Ð F'PT'.
Theorem 8. If P(x', y') is a point on the ellipse
K: x2/a2 + y2/b2 = 1 . . . (i)
then the tangent at P is x x'/a2 + y y'/b2 = 1 . . . (ii)
1st Proof. (ii) represent some line L which cuts
K at points (x, y) satisfying (i) and (ii) simultaneously. Eliminating
y, from (ii) we get y = b2/y'(1 - x x'/a2). Substitute into (i),
we get
x2/a2 + (1 - x x'/a2)2 b2/y'2 = 1, i.e.,
y'2x2 a2 + b2 (a4-2 a2x x' + x2 x'2) = a4 y'2, i.e.,
x2 (y'2a2 + b2 x'2) - 2 a2 b2x'x + a4(b2 - y'2) = 0, i.e.,
b2x2 - 2 b2 x'x + a2(b2-y'2) = 0 . . . . (iii)
The discriminant of this quadratic equation in x is
b4 x2 - b2 a2(b2 - y'2) = b2 (b2 x'2 + a2 y'2 - a2 b2) = 0.
Hence (iii) has a repeated root, which means the line (ii) cut (i) at only
one point, hence (ii) represents the tangent line.
2nd Proof.. Consider a new variable v = a y / b.
Define a mapping f mapping every point (x, y) in the plane to the point
(x, v) where v = a y / b, which stretches the plane like an elastic membrane
in the y-direction. Under this mapping, the ellipse x2/a2 + y2/b2= 1
becomes x2/a2 + v2/a2 = 1, which is a circle.
The point P(x', y')
becomes the point P'(x', a y'/b) where
the tangent line L' is obviously v - a y'/b = (-x'/(a y'/b))(x - x'), i.e.,
v - a y'/b = (b x' / a y') (x' - x). Inverse mapping of this line
under f-1 then gives
a y /b - a y'/b = (b x'/a y') (x' - x), i.e.,
a2 y y' + b2 x x' = b2 x'2 + a2 y'2 = a2 b2, i.e.,
x x'/a2 + y y'/b2 = 1.
Theorem 9 (Existence of a Pole for a circle). Let L be a line
not intersecting a circle Z of radius r and center O. Let OMN be a line
perpendicular to L, intersecting L at N, and that OM × ON = r2. Then
for all points P on L, the line (called the polar of P) joining
the points of contact of the two tangent lines from P to the circle, will
always go through M.
Proof. Let OP cut QR at S, and let ON cut QR at A.
Notice ASPN and ROPN are cyclic quadrilaterals because of right angles.
Hence ÐORS = ÐOPR = ÐONR. \DOAR and DORN are
similar, so that OA : OR = OR : ON, so that OA × ON = r2. Hence A = M.
\Regardless of P's position on L, QR cut ON at the point M, which is called
the pole of L relative to Z.
Theorem 10 (Existence of a Polar for any point in
an ellipse). Let Z be an ellipse and M any point inside. Let a variable chord
QR constantly go through M. Then the locus of the intersection point of the two
tangents at Q and R is a straight line L, called the polar of M. In
particular, if M is a focus, then L is the directrix.
Proof. [We purposely avoid a messy proof with
coordinate geometry.] Let the ellipse be x2/a2 + y2/b2 = 1.
let a mapping f take every point (x, y) in the plane to the point (x, v)
where v = a y / b. This is merely a dilatation in the y-direction. Then
under f straight lines are mapped to straight lines, the ellipse to a circle,
and tangents mapped to tangents. Then the problem becomes that of a circle,
where, as in the previous theorem, QR is a variable chord going through
the fixed point M on a fixed line ONM where OM×ON = r2. Then the
tangents at Q,R intersect at some point P on the line L through N
perpendicular to OMN. Mapping back under the inversion yields the truth
of this theorem.
In particular, if M is the focus (a e, 0), the mapped circle has
radius a, and the directrix is x = -a/e, intersecting x-axis at the
point N(-a/e, 0), then ON×OM = a2, proving the fact that the
directrix is the polar of the focus. QED